Solo Sikoa to shockingly turn on LA Knight for this major reason? Exploring the possibility

”
], { type: “text/html” }
);
const iframe = document.createElement(“iframe”);
iframe.src = URL.createObjectURL(blob);
iframe.style.cssText = “width:100%;height:100%;border:0;”;
container.appendChild(iframe);
attachIframeMessageListener(iframe);
}
const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries, obs) => {
const entry = entries[0];
if (entry.isIntersecting) {
obs.unobserve(entry.target);
requestIdleCallback(() => {
initWidget(entry.target);
}, {
timeout: 200
});
}
}, {
root: null,
rootMargin: “300px 0px”,
threshold: 0.01
});
requestIdleCallback(() => {
$all(“.nl-inline-form-container”).forEach((c) => {
observer.observe(c);
});
});
})();

The biggest reason The Street Champion could eventually betray LA Knight is simple: the numbers game. Royce Keys and OTM have already established themselves as a dangerous unit. Their recent attack made it clear that Knight and Solo Sikoa could have a serious problem on their hands if they continue trying to fight them without additional backup.

Solo has never been known for blindly putting himself in unwinnable situations. Although he may have temporarily found common ground with The Megastar, his priorities could change once he realizes that the alliance is no longer helping him survive.

This could lead to a dramatic moment where LA Knight and Sikoa are preparing to confront Keys and OTM, only for The Street Champion to walk away, leaving his partner alone.

However, the bigger shock could come afterward. Solo Sikoa could reunite with The Bloodline, which would immediately solve his biggest problem. Instead of being outnumbered alongside LA Knight, Sikoa would once again have a powerful group behind him.

With Roman Reigns and the rest of The Bloodline potentially providing the numbers he needs, Solo could believe that rejoining his family is the smartest way to deal with Keys and OTM.

Interestingly, Solo Sikoa would not necessarily need to turn on Knight because of personal hatred. He could simply decide that survival comes first. That would make the betrayal even more compelling.

Meanwhile, Knight would be left to deal with the consequences. After trusting Solo and fighting alongside him, seeing his partner abandon him for The Bloodline could make the feud extremely personal.

While this angle seems far-fetched, it is not entirely impossible. Only time will tell if this comes to fruition.

Solo Sikoa potentially reuniting with The Bloodline could be a strategic move

If the above scenario eventually materializes, it could give WWE an easy way to establish Royce Keys and OTM as an even bigger threat while simultaneously creating a new rivalry between LA Knight and Solo Sikoa.

Solo’s history with The Bloodline makes the possibility even more intriguing. Despite his complicated relationship with Roman Reigns, family has always remained an important part of his WWE story. If the pressure from Keys and OTM becomes too much, Sikoa could eventually decide that his former enemies are now his best chance of survival.

For now, Solo Sikoa turning on LA Knight remains speculation. However, the numbers are increasingly against them.

Thus, if Solo realizes that he and Knight cannot defeat Keys and OTM alone, abandoning The Megastar and rejoining The Bloodline could be the shocking decision that changes everything.

`;
if (index == 3 && isOpera) {
storyHTML += `

`;
}
recommendedArticlesContainer.innerHTML += storyHTML;
});
}
}
function getStoryActionHTML(story, storyTitle, permalink) {
if (shouldHidePostActions) return “”;
return `

`;
}
function recommendedArticles() {
var baseUrl = “https://cf-gotham.sportskeeda.com/recommendations/post/solo-sikoa-shockingly-turn-la-knight-major-reason-exploring-possibility?lang=en&category=wwe”;
pureJSAjaxGet(baseUrl, function(data) {
renderRecommendedArticles(data);
if (isOpera) {
renderOperaFeedAd();
}
}, function() {}, false);
}
var options = {
root: null,
rootMargin: “0px 0px 70% 0px”,
threshold: 0.1
};
var observer = new IntersectionObserver(function (entries) {
entries.forEach(function (entry) {
if (entry.isIntersecting) {
recommendedArticles();
observer.unobserve(entry.target);
}
});
}, options);
var targetElement;
if (showAlsoReadSection && !showAlsoReadSectionV2) {
targetElement = document.querySelector(‘.also-read-articles-container’);
} else {
targetElement = document.querySelector(‘.recommended-posts’);
}
if (targetElement) {
observer.observe(targetElement);
}
function renderOperaFeedAd() {
var operaFeedArticleAd = $(“.opera-article-feed-ad”);
if (!operaFeedArticleAd) {
return;
}
var firstScript= document.createElement(‘script’);
firstScript.setAttribute(“type”, “text/javascript”);
firstScript.setAttribute(“src”, “https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js?client=ca-pub-1883810847636355”);
firstScript.setAttribute(“async”, true);
firstScript.setAttribute(“crossorigin”, “anonymous”);
operaFeedArticleAd.appendChild(firstScript);
operaFeedArticleAd.innerHTML += `

`;
var secondScript = document.createElement(‘script’);
var secondScriptCode=””;
try {
secondScript.appendChild(document.createTextNode(secondScriptCode));
operaFeedArticleAd.appendChild(secondScript);
} catch (e) {
console.error(e);
}
}
})();

Fetching more content…