”
], { type: “text/html” }
);
const iframe = document.createElement(“iframe”);
iframe.src = URL.createObjectURL(blob);
iframe.style.cssText = “width:100%;height:100%;border:0;”;
container.appendChild(iframe);
attachIframeMessageListener(iframe);
}
const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries, obs) => {
const entry = entries[0];
if (entry.isIntersecting) {
obs.unobserve(entry.target);
requestIdleCallback(() => {
initWidget(entry.target);
}, {
timeout: 200
});
}
}, {
root: null,
rootMargin: “300px 0px”,
threshold: 0.01
});
requestIdleCallback(() => {
$all(“.nl-inline-form-container”).forEach((c) => {
observer.observe(c);
});
});
})();
Since Sol Ruca is facing Raquel Rodriguez in a rematch for the Women’s Intercontinental Championship next week, Vaquer doesn’t have to go through each member to earn a shot at Morgan.
The WrestleMania 42 rematch should headline that episode of RAW, but with Roman Reigns coming and going at will, anything is possible. The Man is a big star, but WWE may have kept Lynch out of the title match for any of the next four reasons.
#4. Lynch didn’t do anything to warrant getting a title shot
Some WWE stars simply confront the current champion and get an automatic title shot. This happened between Cody Rhodes and CM Punk for SummerSlam. Charlotte Flair and Randy Orton do this all the time because WWE considers them above having to earn a title opportunity like other performers.
Lynch falls into the same category, but hasn’t competed since May. Her star power helps any time she shows up. Winning a shot via a #1 Contender’s match would at least make sense.
Vaquer was the former Women’s World Champion and had to fight at least one match before being considered for a rematch. Since Big Time Becks and La Primera want the same thing, they should at least have to go through the same process for a title opportunity.
#3. WWE officials may want Lynch vs. Morgan to be a singles feud
Becky Lynch is clearly one of the top stars in wrestling regardless of gender. She cuts great promos and elevates every star she feuds with. Her feuds with Lyra Valkyria, Tiffany Stratton, and Sol Ruca are proof of this.
Morgan has clearly become one of Triple H’s favorites. If that wasn’t the case, she would have lost the title at SummerSlam. That didn’t happen, even with that fight marking her first title defense since beating Vaquer at WrestleMania 42 in April.
Due to Lynch’s star power and Morgan’s popularity as an annoying heel, officials may prefer to have the two women face off one-on-one. It could be used for an upcoming PLE like Money in the Bank or WarGames. Lynch is one of WWE’s biggest names and should be headlining PLEs.
#2. It was the planned program after WrestleMania 42
WWE planned for this rematch after the title swap at WrestleMania 42, but Vaquer suffered an injury. The ailment postponed the feud until she was fully healed. Morgan faced Sol Ruca in a non-title match on the RAW after The Showcase of the Immortals, and La Primera confronted her as she left the ring.
Morgan would then reign for over 100 days without defending the Women’s World Championship once. It became an ongoing joke, especially since she made the finals of the Queen of the Ring Tournament.
Lynch even made light of the fact during her return promos. Several women could have challenged for the title in the interim, including Lyra Valkyria, IYO SKY, and Bayley.
Since another match between Vaquer and Morgan was the direction following WrestleMania 42, WWE officials may want to get that feud out of the way before involving Becky Lynch in a championship program with Morgan.
#1. WWE is saving her for a potential triple threat at Money in the Bank
The last big WWE PLE was SummerSlam at the beginning of August. The next live event is Sunday Night’s Main Event. Officials are treating RAW from Mexico City as a big deal since Roman Reigns will defend the World Heavyweight Championship against the winner of a tournament featuring AAA stars.
There aren’t any PLEs, however, until Money in the Bank on October 10th. That’s a game-changing event, and booking title matches provides the chance for a same-night cash-in for either winner.
The Vaquer/Morgan rematch should be on a bigger show like Money in the Bank, so putting it on an episode of RAW feels like it will lead to a false finish. Rodriguez and Perez could interfere to cause a disqualification.
Lynch could also cost Vaquer. That would give The Dark Angel grounds for a rematch. Putting all three in one match at Money in the Bank makes sense. It would take two former winners out of the ladder match and make Vaquer a favorite to win the 2027 Royal Rumble if she loses.
Most major title programs consist of three showdowns. The Morgan/Vaquer match in two weeks would only be the second such instance in this program. WWE could also transition to the next feud over the belt by adding Lynch in the third showdown.
`;
if (index == 3 && isOpera) {
storyHTML += `
`;
}
recommendedArticlesContainer.innerHTML += storyHTML;
});
}
}
function getStoryActionHTML(story, storyTitle, permalink) {
if (shouldHidePostActions) return “”;
return `
`;
}
function recommendedArticles() {
var baseUrl = “https://cf-gotham.sportskeeda.com/recommendations/post/4-reasons-wwe-add-becky-lynch-liv-morgan-vs-stephanie-vaquer-s-women-s-world-championship-match?lang=en&category=wwe”;
pureJSAjaxGet(baseUrl, function(data) {
renderRecommendedArticles(data);
if (isOpera) {
renderOperaFeedAd();
}
}, function() {}, false);
}
var options = {
root: null,
rootMargin: “0px 0px 70% 0px”,
threshold: 0.1
};
var observer = new IntersectionObserver(function (entries) {
entries.forEach(function (entry) {
if (entry.isIntersecting) {
recommendedArticles();
observer.unobserve(entry.target);
}
});
}, options);
var targetElement;
if (showAlsoReadSection && !showAlsoReadSectionV2) {
targetElement = document.querySelector(‘.also-read-articles-container’);
} else {
targetElement = document.querySelector(‘.recommended-posts’);
}
if (targetElement) {
observer.observe(targetElement);
}
function renderOperaFeedAd() {
var operaFeedArticleAd = $(“.opera-article-feed-ad”);
if (!operaFeedArticleAd) {
return;
}
var firstScript= document.createElement(‘script’);
firstScript.setAttribute(“type”, “text/javascript”);
firstScript.setAttribute(“src”, “https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js?client=ca-pub-1883810847636355”);
firstScript.setAttribute(“async”, true);
firstScript.setAttribute(“crossorigin”, “anonymous”);
operaFeedArticleAd.appendChild(firstScript);
operaFeedArticleAd.innerHTML += `
`;
var secondScript = document.createElement(‘script’);
var secondScriptCode=””;
try {
secondScript.appendChild(document.createTextNode(secondScriptCode));
operaFeedArticleAd.appendChild(secondScript);
} catch (e) {
console.error(e);
}
}
})();
Fetching more content…
Read the full article here













