”
], { type: “text/html” }
);
const iframe = document.createElement(“iframe”);
iframe.src = URL.createObjectURL(blob);
iframe.style.cssText = “width:100%;height:100%;border:0;”;
container.appendChild(iframe);
attachIframeMessageListener(iframe);
}
const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries, obs) => {
const entry = entries[0];
if (entry.isIntersecting) {
obs.unobserve(entry.target);
requestIdleCallback(() => {
initWidget(entry.target);
}, {
timeout: 200
});
}
}, {
root: null,
rootMargin: “300px 0px”,
threshold: 0.01
});
requestIdleCallback(() => {
$all(“.nl-inline-form-container”).forEach((c) => {
observer.observe(c);
});
});
})();
Solo Sikoa’s appearance on WWE RAW and attacking Jimmy make it clear that Solo is ready to go to war with the Roman Reigns-led faction. In this article, we will discuss three possible reasons why Sikoa attacked Big Jim on RAW before Night of Champions 2026.
#3. To send a message to the OTC
Roman Reigns told Jacob Fatu to go to SmackDown and convince Solo Sikoa to come back to The Bloodline. The MFT leader, however, showed no interest in joining the OTC again, especially due to their heated history.
Solo attacking Jimmy on the red brand sends a huge message to the Original Tribal Chief that he will not hold back if Roman continues to create problems for him.
This is one of the reasons why the former WWE US Champion attacked Big Jim on the red brand before the Saudi Arabia show.
#2. Setting the stage for his return to The Bloodline in WWE
Solo Sikoa’s inclusion in the latest Bloodline saga began at Clash in Italy 2026. The MFT leader and his group appeared at ringside after Roman Reigns defeated Jacob Fatu to retain his WWE World Heavyweight Championship.
Since then, Jacob has been on a mission to bring Solo back into the family group, on Reigns’ orders. He offered him a chance to return to The Bloodline, but Sikoa refused. However, the 33-year-old attacking Jimmy on RAW could be WWE’s way of planting the seeds and setting the stage for Solo Sikoa’s return to Roman Reigns’ alliance.
His refusal to come back to the fold will likely make things more heated between the two groups, and we might soon see Solo being forced by Roman to join the Bloodline, similar to the way Jacob Fatu was.
#1. Planting seeds for another Bloodline Civil War
A Bloodline Civil War match took place when Reigns was the Undisputed WWE Universal Champion. This was a Bloodline Civil War Tag Team Match that was booked after The Usos betrayed the Tribal Chief in the lead-up to Money in the Bank 2023. Solo was on the OTC’s side at the time, but The Usos won.
However, later, Sikoa turned his back on the OG Bloodline leader after he lost his title to Cody Rhodes and went on hiatus. Solo took advantage and inserted himself as the new leader of a fractured Bloodline. This eventually led to the Bloodline Civil War match at Survivor Series: WarGames 2024.
Jacob Fatu said on RAW that he would teach Solo a lesson if he crossed the line. Attacking Jimmy Uso could be seen as Solo doing exactly that, planting the seeds for another Bloodline Civil War in WWE.
Things between Solo and his faction members don’t seem to be good at the moment, but he may resolve the conflict within the MFT and soon engage in a feud with The Bloodline.
It will be interesting to see how the storyline unfolds in the forthcoming weeks. Major developments are expected as we head towards SummerSlam 2026.
More from Sportskeeda
${getStoryActionHTML(story, storyTitle, permalink)}
`;
if (index == 3 && isOpera) {
storyHTML += `
`;
}
recommendedArticlesContainer.innerHTML += storyHTML;
});
}
}
function getStoryActionHTML(story, storyTitle, permalink) {
if (shouldHidePostActions) return “”;
return `
`;
}
function recommendedArticles() {
var baseUrl = “https://cf-gotham.sportskeeda.com/recommendations/post/3-reasons-solo-sikoa-attacked-jimmy-uso-wwe-raw?lang=en&category=wwe”;
pureJSAjaxGet(baseUrl, function(data) {
renderRecommendedArticles(data);
if (isOpera) {
renderOperaFeedAd();
}
}, function() {}, false);
}
var options = {
root: null,
rootMargin: “0px 0px 70% 0px”,
threshold: 0.1
};
var observer = new IntersectionObserver(function (entries) {
entries.forEach(function (entry) {
if (entry.isIntersecting) {
recommendedArticles();
observer.unobserve(entry.target);
}
});
}, options);
var targetElement;
if (showAlsoReadSection && !showAlsoReadSectionV2) {
targetElement = document.querySelector(‘.also-read-articles-container’);
} else {
targetElement = document.querySelector(‘.recommended-posts’);
}
if (targetElement) {
observer.observe(targetElement);
}
function renderOperaFeedAd() {
var operaFeedArticleAd = $(“.opera-article-feed-ad”);
if (!operaFeedArticleAd) {
return;
}
var firstScript= document.createElement(‘script’);
firstScript.setAttribute(“type”, “text/javascript”);
firstScript.setAttribute(“src”, “https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js?client=ca-pub-1883810847636355”);
firstScript.setAttribute(“async”, true);
firstScript.setAttribute(“crossorigin”, “anonymous”);
operaFeedArticleAd.appendChild(firstScript);
operaFeedArticleAd.innerHTML += `
`;
var secondScript = document.createElement(‘script’);
var secondScriptCode=””;
try {
secondScript.appendChild(document.createTextNode(secondScriptCode));
operaFeedArticleAd.appendChild(secondScript);
} catch (e) {
console.error(e);
}
}
})();
Fetching more content…
Read the full article here
