3 Consequences The Judgment Day Could Face For Once Again Cheating And Costing Stephanie Vaquer The Women’s World Championship

”
], { type: “text/html” }
);
const iframe = document.createElement(“iframe”);
iframe.src = URL.createObjectURL(blob);
iframe.style.cssText = “width:100%;height:100%;border:0;”;
container.appendChild(iframe);
attachIframeMessageListener(iframe);
}
const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries, obs) => {
const entry = entries[0];
if (entry.isIntersecting) {
obs.unobserve(entry.target);
requestIdleCallback(() => {
initWidget(entry.target);
}, {
timeout: 200
});
}
}, {
root: null,
rootMargin: “300px 0px”,
threshold: 0.01
});
requestIdleCallback(() => {
$all(“.nl-inline-form-container”).forEach((c) => {
observer.observe(c);
});
});
})();

The result raises an important question: how much longer can WWE allow The Judgment Day to influence major title matches? La Primera has already experienced their interference at WrestleMania 42. Thus, their latest actions could force Adam Pearce to take measures.

That said, in this article, we look at three consequences The Judgment Day could face for once again costing Stephanie Vaquer the Women’s World Championship.

#3. Roxanne Perez is banned from challenging for any titles for the foreseeable future

Roxanne Perez could be the member who pays the highest price for The Judgment Day’s latest actions.

Perez was involved in the finish on RAW. She handed the Women’s World Championship to Liv Morgan. Although Becky Lynch chased The Prodigy into the crowd, the opening allowed the champion to use the title as a weapon against Stephanie Vaquer. That makes it difficult for WWE management to ignore her role in another controversial finish.

The punishment would be to temporarily remove Roxanne Perez from the championship picture. Adam Pearce could announce that, because Perez has repeatedly interfered in title situations, she has forfeited her right to challenge for any championship for a period.

This would be fitting because The Prodigy has established herself as one of the most dangerous members of Morgan’s support system. WWE could make the punishment last until she competes in several matches without outside interference, giving her a path to earn her way back into contention.

It would also create tension within The Judgment Day. Roxanne Perez might argue that she was protecting The Miracle Kid. However, management could make it clear that helping a champion does not give her permission to manipulate championship matches.

#2. The Judgment Day isn’t allowed at ringside for major title matches

If WWE wants to stop the problem at its source, Adam Pearce could introduce a broader rule: The Judgment Day is banned from ringside for major championship matches.

This would be a strong response because the faction has demonstrated how dangerous its numbers advantage can be. At WrestleMania 42, Roxanne Perez and Raquel Rodriguez interfered during Stephanie Vaquer vs. Liv Morgan, helping the latter capture the championship. Months later, the same dynamic resurfaced on RAW.

Rather than simply punishing one member, Pearce could decide that the entire faction has lost the privilege of accompanying Morgan to ringside.

That would change the dynamic around The Miracle Kid’s title defenses. Without Roxanne Perez and Raquel Rodriguez nearby, Liv Morgan would have to prove that she can defeat elite challengers on her own. It could also force The Judgment Day to become more creative, potentially creating new storylines if they attempt to circumvent the restriction.

It would give future challengers confidence that they will have a fair opportunity to win.

#1. Adam Pearce signs a Steel Cage Match where Liv Morgan has to defend the Women’s World Championship against Stephanie Vaquer so The Judgment Day can’t interfere

The most dramatic consequence would be Adam Pearce finally eliminating the interference problem.

If The Judgment Day keeps finding ways to change the outcome of Stephanie Vaquer’s championship matches, Pearce could book Liv Morgan against Vaquer inside a Steel Cage. The stipulation would be simple: Morgan must defend the Women’s World Championship, and no member of The Judgment Day can enter the cage.

This would be a perfect escalation because Vaquer has already shown that she can push The Miracle Kid to her limits when the match remains competitive. On RAW, La Primera damaged Morgan’s knee and hit Devil’s Kiss twice, including a devastating version on the announce table. The challenger appeared close to finishing the job before Judgment Day’s interference changed everything.

A Steel Cage match would remove the faction’s biggest advantage. Perez and Rodriguez could scream instructions from outside. However, they could not physically pull Vaquer off the ropes, distract the referee, or hand Morgan the championship belt.

For Liv Morgan, it would become a defining test. She could no longer rely on her allies to rescue her whenever Stephanie Vaquer gains momentum. If Morgan truly believes she is “The Greatest Women’s Champion of all time,” as WWE has portrayed her, she would have to prove it without Judgment Day standing between her and defeat.

Meanwhile, for Stephanie Vaquer, the cage could represent one final opportunity to settle the score. She has already been denied the championship by interference at WrestleMania and RAW. If Adam Pearce wants to restore credibility to the Women’s World Championship picture, giving La Primera a match where The Judgment Day is completely neutralized could be the strongest possible response.

`;
if (index == 3 && isOpera) {
storyHTML += `

`;
}
recommendedArticlesContainer.innerHTML += storyHTML;
});
}
}
function getStoryActionHTML(story, storyTitle, permalink) {
if (shouldHidePostActions) return “”;
return `

`;
}
function recommendedArticles() {
var baseUrl = “https://cf-gotham.sportskeeda.com/recommendations/post/3-consequences-the-judgment-day-could-face-for-once-again-cheating-and-costing-stephanie-vaquer-the-women-s-world-championship?lang=en&category=wwe”;
pureJSAjaxGet(baseUrl, function(data) {
renderRecommendedArticles(data);
if (isOpera) {
renderOperaFeedAd();
}
}, function() {}, false);
}
var options = {
root: null,
rootMargin: “0px 0px 70% 0px”,
threshold: 0.1
};
var observer = new IntersectionObserver(function (entries) {
entries.forEach(function (entry) {
if (entry.isIntersecting) {
recommendedArticles();
observer.unobserve(entry.target);
}
});
}, options);
var targetElement;
if (showAlsoReadSection && !showAlsoReadSectionV2) {
targetElement = document.querySelector(‘.also-read-articles-container’);
} else {
targetElement = document.querySelector(‘.recommended-posts’);
}
if (targetElement) {
observer.observe(targetElement);
}
function renderOperaFeedAd() {
var operaFeedArticleAd = $(“.opera-article-feed-ad”);
if (!operaFeedArticleAd) {
return;
}
var firstScript= document.createElement(‘script’);
firstScript.setAttribute(“type”, “text/javascript”);
firstScript.setAttribute(“src”, “https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js?client=ca-pub-1883810847636355”);
firstScript.setAttribute(“async”, true);
firstScript.setAttribute(“crossorigin”, “anonymous”);
operaFeedArticleAd.appendChild(firstScript);
operaFeedArticleAd.innerHTML += `

`;
var secondScript = document.createElement(‘script’);
var secondScriptCode=””;
try {
secondScript.appendChild(document.createTextNode(secondScriptCode));
operaFeedArticleAd.appendChild(secondScript);
} catch (e) {
console.error(e);
}
}
})();

Fetching more content…