”
], { type: “text/html” }
);
const iframe = document.createElement(“iframe”);
iframe.src = URL.createObjectURL(blob);
iframe.style.cssText = “width:100%;height:100%;border:0;”;
container.appendChild(iframe);
attachIframeMessageListener(iframe);
}
const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries, obs) => {
const entry = entries[0];
if (entry.isIntersecting) {
obs.unobserve(entry.target);
requestIdleCallback(() => {
initWidget(entry.target);
}, {
timeout: 200
});
}
}, {
root: null,
rootMargin: “300px 0px”,
threshold: 0.01
});
requestIdleCallback(() => {
$all(“.nl-inline-form-container”).forEach((c) => {
observer.observe(c);
});
});
})();
That leaves Jacob Fatu as the one man who could be next to turn on Reigns. Fatu’s position within the family has become increasingly complicated. The Samoan Werewolf has already experienced a turbulent relationship with Bloodline leadership, having challenged Reigns for the World Heavyweight Championship in Tribal Combat earlier this year. WWE itself described the rivalry as having major implications for the future of The Bloodline.
Although Fatu eventually acknowledged Reigns and appeared to accept his authority, the underlying tension never completely disappeared.
Jacob Fatu has already shown signs of frustration
The biggest reason Jacob Fatu could eventually betray Roman Reigns is that he does not appear comfortable playing second fiddle.
Reigns has consistently positioned himself as the unquestioned leader of the family. However, Fatu has previously demonstrated that he wants to establish himself as a major force. His challenge to Roman earlier this year proved that he is not afraid to stand across the ring from the OTC.
On this week’s episode of Monday Night RAW, Roman Reigns awarded black ula falas to Jimmy and Jey Uso, naming them the captains of the group. Jacob Fatu, who previously received a brown ula fala, looked visibly unhappy and disgruntled by this hierarchy shift and lack of individual acknowledgment.
WWE and on-screen commentary heavily highlighted this friction, which culminated when Fatu stood back in the corner and watched instead of saving Reigns from a subsequent attack by Solo Sikoa and LA Knight.
That dynamic could become dangerous now that Solo has officially rejected Roman.
Roman Reigns may have pushed Fatu too far
The biggest mistake Roman Reigns could make is assuming Jacob Fatu will remain loyal simply because they are family.
Roman has built his entire leadership philosophy around respect, hierarchy, and obedience. However, Fatu is arguably the member of the family least likely to accept being treated as another soldier.
Given this, Solo Sikoa’s betrayal could therefore create the perfect opening. If Reigns begins relying even more heavily on Jacob Fatu to compensate for Sikoa’s absence, the pressure could eventually become unbearable.
Fatu may realize that Roman does not truly view him as an equal, but merely as another weapon protecting his position. Thus, that could lead to another shocking Bloodline betrayal.
Fatu could become Roman’s biggest problem
There is also a fascinating parallel between Solo Sikoa and Jacob Fatu. Both men have been presented as dangerous members of the family who can challenge established authority. Solo has now made his choice.
Fatu’s choice could be next. Thus, if he finally snaps, WWE could produce one of the biggest twists in The Bloodline saga. Roman Reigns has spent years dealing with betrayal from people closest to him. With Solo now gone, Jacob Fatu may be the final piece waiting to fall.
Considering how frustrated Fatu has looked recently, Roman should probably be watching his back.
`;
if (index == 3 && isOpera) {
storyHTML += `
`;
}
recommendedArticlesContainer.innerHTML += storyHTML;
});
}
}
function getStoryActionHTML(story, storyTitle, permalink) {
if (shouldHidePostActions) return “”;
return `
`;
}
function recommendedArticles() {
var baseUrl = “https://cf-gotham.sportskeeda.com/recommendations/post/there-s-now-only-one-man-left-betray-roman-reigns-after-solo-sikoa?lang=en&category=wwe”;
pureJSAjaxGet(baseUrl, function(data) {
renderRecommendedArticles(data);
if (isOpera) {
renderOperaFeedAd();
}
}, function() {}, false);
}
var options = {
root: null,
rootMargin: “0px 0px 70% 0px”,
threshold: 0.1
};
var observer = new IntersectionObserver(function (entries) {
entries.forEach(function (entry) {
if (entry.isIntersecting) {
recommendedArticles();
observer.unobserve(entry.target);
}
});
}, options);
var targetElement;
if (showAlsoReadSection && !showAlsoReadSectionV2) {
targetElement = document.querySelector(‘.also-read-articles-container’);
} else {
targetElement = document.querySelector(‘.recommended-posts’);
}
if (targetElement) {
observer.observe(targetElement);
}
function renderOperaFeedAd() {
var operaFeedArticleAd = $(“.opera-article-feed-ad”);
if (!operaFeedArticleAd) {
return;
}
var firstScript= document.createElement(‘script’);
firstScript.setAttribute(“type”, “text/javascript”);
firstScript.setAttribute(“src”, “https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js?client=ca-pub-1883810847636355”);
firstScript.setAttribute(“async”, true);
firstScript.setAttribute(“crossorigin”, “anonymous”);
operaFeedArticleAd.appendChild(firstScript);
operaFeedArticleAd.innerHTML += `
`;
var secondScript = document.createElement(‘script’);
var secondScriptCode=””;
try {
secondScript.appendChild(document.createTextNode(secondScriptCode));
operaFeedArticleAd.appendChild(secondScript);
} catch (e) {
console.error(e);
}
}
})();
Fetching more content…
Read the full article here













