”
], { type: “text/html” }
);
const iframe = document.createElement(“iframe”);
iframe.src = URL.createObjectURL(blob);
iframe.style.cssText = “width:100%;height:100%;border:0;”;
container.appendChild(iframe);
attachIframeMessageListener(iframe);
}
const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries, obs) => {
const entry = entries[0];
if (entry.isIntersecting) {
obs.unobserve(entry.target);
requestIdleCallback(() => {
initWidget(entry.target);
}, {
timeout: 200
});
}
}, {
root: null,
rootMargin: “300px 0px”,
threshold: 0.01
});
requestIdleCallback(() => {
$all(“.nl-inline-form-container”).forEach((c) => {
observer.observe(c);
});
});
})();
Paxley has quickly become an important piece of this equation. She arrived on SmackDown by helping The Queen against The Storm and subsequently picked up a victory over Michin, giving her momentum before the event. Meanwhile, Jade Cargill has already announced that she will bring back her “Baddie section” for the Atlanta show.
That said, in this article, we look at four finishes WWE could consider for the upcoming match.
#4. Charlotte Flair pins B-Fab
The most straightforward option would see Charlotte Flair lead her team to victory. B-Fab could become the designated weak link after a competitive six-woman contest, allowing Flair to hit Natural Selection before scoring the three-count.
This would be a logical television-style finish because it gives Flair and her partners a win without making Cargill or Michin take a decisive loss. Bliss could neutralize Michin at ringside while Paxley prevents Cargill from breaking the cover.
Flair picking up the victory would also reinforce her position as the group’s established star. Paxley would still benefit from sharing the spotlight. Meanwhile, Bliss could continue building momentum alongside Flair.
#3. Jade Cargill pins Tatum Paxley
WWE could instead choose to make Jade Cargill’s team look dominant by having The Storm pin Tatum Paxley. Since the latter is still establishing herself on the main roster, a defeat wouldn’t necessarily hurt her momentum.
The key would be how WWE presents the loss. Paxley could have a strong showing before Cargill catches her with Jaded after a distraction or chaotic sequence. The Storm then gets the win while Charlotte Flair and Alexa Bliss are left frustrated.
This finish would give Jade Cargill a major statement victory over Flair’s newest ally. Also, it could set up another singles encounter between Cargill and Paxley, especially after their recent involvement on SmackDown.
#2. Alexa Bliss pins Michin
Another intriguing possibility is Alexa Bliss scoring the winning fall. The Goddess could capitalize on a mistake by Michin and hit Twisted Bliss to secure the victory for her team.
This outcome would be useful if WWE wants to keep Charlotte Flair and Jade Cargill’s rivalry simmering without allowing either woman to decisively defeat the other. Bliss would get a meaningful victory. Meanwhile, Michin can absorb the loss without suffering the same damage that Cargill would.
It could also strengthen the chemistry between The Goddess and Flair. Their partnership has been one of the more recognizable elements of the current story. Thus, another tag-team-style victory would allow WWE to emphasize their alliance while giving Paxley valuable experience.
However, WWE would need to account for Alexa Bliss’ status heading into the event. She revealed on social media that she suffered an eye injury in a freak accident at home. Thus, if Bliss is medically cleared, the finish remains plausible; if not, the company could alter the match.
#1. Jade Cargill pins Charlotte Flair
The biggest surprise would be Jade Cargill pinning Charlotte Flair. WWE could book the closing stretch around the two stars, with Cargill surviving Flair’s offense before countering a decisive move and hitting Jaded for the victory.
A clean win would immediately elevate The Storm and give the rivalry a significant new chapter. The Queen could then have a reason to demand another singles match. Meanwhile, Jade Cargill could claim that she has proven herself against one of WWE’s biggest names.
The Atlanta setting makes this particularly appealing. Cargill has already teased the return of her “Baddie section,” so securing the decisive victory in front of her supporters would make for a memorable moment.
Still, WWE may prefer to protect Charlotte Flair, especially if the company sees more value in extending this rivalry. A protected finish, such as Jade Cargill pinning Tatum Paxley after Flair is taken out, might therefore be more likely.
Ultimately, the match offers WWE several directions. A Flair win would provide a conventional payoff. Paxley’s loss could establish Cargill as a threat. Bliss could steal the spotlight. Also, The Storm could make the biggest statement by pinning Flair.
With multiple personalities involved, the finish could plant the seeds for another major SmackDown confrontation.
`;
if (index == 3 && isOpera) {
storyHTML += `
`;
}
recommendedArticlesContainer.innerHTML += storyHTML;
});
}
}
function getStoryActionHTML(story, storyTitle, permalink) {
if (shouldHidePostActions) return “”;
return `
`;
}
function recommendedArticles() {
var baseUrl = “https://cf-gotham.sportskeeda.com/recommendations/post/4-finishes-charlotte-flair-alexa-bliss-tatum-paxley-vs-jade-cargill-michin-b-fab-wwe-sunday-night-s-main-event?lang=en&category=wwe”;
pureJSAjaxGet(baseUrl, function(data) {
renderRecommendedArticles(data);
if (isOpera) {
renderOperaFeedAd();
}
}, function() {}, false);
}
var options = {
root: null,
rootMargin: “0px 0px 70% 0px”,
threshold: 0.1
};
var observer = new IntersectionObserver(function (entries) {
entries.forEach(function (entry) {
if (entry.isIntersecting) {
recommendedArticles();
observer.unobserve(entry.target);
}
});
}, options);
var targetElement;
if (showAlsoReadSection && !showAlsoReadSectionV2) {
targetElement = document.querySelector(‘.also-read-articles-container’);
} else {
targetElement = document.querySelector(‘.recommended-posts’);
}
if (targetElement) {
observer.observe(targetElement);
}
function renderOperaFeedAd() {
var operaFeedArticleAd = $(“.opera-article-feed-ad”);
if (!operaFeedArticleAd) {
return;
}
var firstScript= document.createElement(‘script’);
firstScript.setAttribute(“type”, “text/javascript”);
firstScript.setAttribute(“src”, “https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js?client=ca-pub-1883810847636355”);
firstScript.setAttribute(“async”, true);
firstScript.setAttribute(“crossorigin”, “anonymous”);
operaFeedArticleAd.appendChild(firstScript);
operaFeedArticleAd.innerHTML += `
`;
var secondScript = document.createElement(‘script’);
var secondScriptCode=””;
try {
secondScript.appendChild(document.createTextNode(secondScriptCode));
operaFeedArticleAd.appendChild(secondScript);
} catch (e) {
console.error(e);
}
}
})();
Fetching more content…
Read the full article here













